| 
           
          
          An artist with many facets, Bose 
          Krishnamachari likes to tread the roads not taken by many. He 
          establishes his projects as institutions critiquing the conventional institutional 
          setup. Bose is on his way to set up his museum in Kerala, which has a 
          lot to do with his pioneering project Amuseum ‘92. Vrushali Dhage 
          catches up with the artist. 
          
            
          
          VD: You have had a long time association 
          with books, isn’t it ...  
          BK:
          Yes, I have always been an avid reader. I 
          remember, in childhood itself, I used to get a lot of books written by 
          local as well as international writers. International literature came 
          to us through translations, which were mostly published by the Russian 
          publishers. Those were precious treasure houses that came to us for a 
          cheap price. I read on all topics including art. As an artist I feel 
          there is an obvious need for verbal articulation. One cannot convey 
          wrong ideas about ones works. Later I used books directly into my 
          works, not only as ideas but also as visual forms.  
          
          VD: You seem to take pride in saying that you never like to follow 
          rules especially when it comes to institutions?  
          BK: 
          Well I am not against any institution, but it’s just the tepid 
          attitude and the rigid rules of the institutions which are a problem. 
          They somehow mould you to conform to set rules. According to me every 
          individual is like an institution. An artist needs to have an innate 
          killer instinct to learn as much as possible, that spark is necessary, 
          for which there is no need of a formal body.   
          
          VD: The notion of ‘impermanence’ lends a strong character to your 
          work…  
          BK: 
          I do believe in the impermanency of knowledge. Everything constantly 
          undergoes transformation. Stagnancy tends to shun growth. Once we 
          freeze things in time they invariably seem to lack life. In both my 
          projects - Amuseum ‘92 and LaVA 
          ‘07, I de-shackled a ‘museum’ and a ‘library’ from their 
          rudimentary, still and monumental status.  Even the ‘Burnt book’ 
          series was like archiving or mummifying books through colour.   
          
          VD: How did these thoughts resonate in Amuseum ‘92?  
          BK:  
          I have always spent long hours in book stores browsing books. I was 
          fascinated by the books street which was earlier there at Fountain, 
          Mumbai.  It was like knowledge on the floor, to me this absurdity 
          struck as an idea for an installation. I tried to play with the word 
          ‘museum’ by associating it with two diametrically opposite concepts of 
          Aum from the Hindu philosophy and with the term ‘amuse’. Amuseum 
          was housed in Jehangir Art Gallery - a no museum space. Further the 
          project traveled to different cities again hinting at the non 
          sedentary aspect and impermanency in a gallery space. The attempt was 
          to construct an ‘Anti-Monument’, by placing books haywire, basically 
          creating chaos; which in turn depicted the chaotic state of our art 
          institutions.   
          
          VD: And in LaVA?  
          BK:  
          Similar to Amuseum the title for 
          LaVA - Laboratory of Visual Arts acted as mocking note – as 
          – not a quiet library space but a space for experimentation. The show 
          was all about ‘interacting’ than ‘simply observing’. Further to add to 
          the randomness –books on art, architecture, design, literature, films, 
          philosophy, travel, theatre, etc. were not segregated according to any 
          category but were placed arbitrarily.  Therefore everyone had to go 
          hunting and picking books from different shelves.   
          
          VD: 
          LaVA was an exhibition which had a heavy footfall, 
          especially students…  
          BK: 
          Our institutions lack many things, one of which is a free environment 
          to work. I guess this project offered that.  
          
          VD: What was your prime concern while 
          materializing LaVA?  
          BK: 
          Prime concern was of course the public. The project was to be worked 
          out at a sociological level; therefore the focus was on the 
          interaction part. I didn’t want people to just take a round in the 
          gallery space and walk out, but to read through books and watch the 
          DVDs, etc.   
          
          VD: You intend to set up a museum in Kerala, don’t you think with 
          this you are contradicting the objective of your earlier two 
          projects?  
          BK: 
          NO, it won’t contradict the objective, as the museum will be similar 
          to my earlier projects. It won’t be a one time effort, but will 
          undergo constant transformation.   
          
          VD: So is it a lifelong project for you?  
          BK: 
          Yes (as he smiles)  
          
          VD: Why Kerala and not Mumbai?  
          BK: 
          Well it’s just a matter of convenience. I have a decently large piece 
          of land which was bought in early ‘07 at Aluva, and the landscape is 
          beautiful. The design for the museum is inspired from Kerala 
          architecture. Nearly an acre of the land will be a dedicated 
          exhibiting space. There is a river nearby and I intend to convert the 
          steps leading to it into an amphitheatre. And I found the place just 
          perfect to start something new.  
          
          VD: India lacks museums which exhibit Indian Contemporary Art. 
          Will the museum house only Indian artists? Do you see this museum 
          helping Indian artists to find place in the international scene? 
          BK: 
          No, I don’t believe in this distinction. Everything can be termed as 
          global and at the same time local, it’s how you perceive it. I have 
          collected works of different artists from India and abroad so these 
          works will surely find their space. I am not burdening it with the 
          objective of promoting Indian art and putting it in the international 
          circuit. I strongly believe that no one can promote anyone; you have 
          to work on your own.  
          
          VD: How do you posit this project of yours? How are you working 
          towards it? 
          BK: 
          As I mentioned earlier I don’t intend to build an institution.  I want 
          to build an ‘experimental’ space. It will 
          be more like a cultivating space. There will be a large collection of 
          books, DVDs, works of various artists, etc. all of which have been 
          collected over the years, especially when I was traveling. I believe 
          in taking the best from what I see, and I am not following a rigid 
          rule, I am open to modification, and changes will be made as and when 
          needed.  Along with me, the museum will have a panel, - they are 
          people from different countries, whom I feel comfortable to work with, 
          and they will play a crucial role. Apart from the museum at Aluva, I 
          also have an idea of having a ‘moving museum’.  
          
          VD: Can you tell us more about the ‘moving museum’ … 
          BK: 
          Currently I have acquired two huge trucks, in which a scaled down 
          version of the stable museum will be set. These trucks will have the 
          same facilities for keeping books, LCD monitors, DVD players... Again 
          by setting the museum on wheels, the question of accessibility will 
          dissolve.  
          
          VD: For a project of this size, you need to have a strong 
          financial spine. Are you taking help from any BIG NAMES or do you see 
          help coming in the near future? 
          BK: 
          Well, I don’t believe in asking for help. It’s very unfortunate that 
          in India, the capital available is rarely used for philanthropic 
          purposes, only a few do that. People have the capital but no vision. 
          Therefore it’s better to work on your own. Currently I am working with 
          my own funds. If someone wants to work with the same level of 
          enthusiasm and clear intension, they are welcome to join.  
          
          VD: The Indian art fraternity is looking forward to the 
          materialization of this project… do you think it will be considered as 
          a milestone… 
          BK: 
          I have no idea about people’s expectations. Currently I am just 
          working within my capacity.  
          
          VD: By when will this project be ready to visit, rather to 
          interact? 
          BK: 
          It will take at least four more years. 
          
            
          
          
          Photo credit : Vrushali Dhage 
           |