| 
           
          
           | 
        
           Curious Mind 
          
          Baiju Parthan speaks 
          to Vrushali Dhage about how books have been his companions as 
          he explored the world. 
          
          One can term Baiju 
          Parthan as a quintessential explorer, as he constantly draws fresh 
          nodes of understanding from whatever 
          resources he sees around his daily life. His restlessness to discover 
          fresh twists or different/ newer ways of seeing, understanding and 
          translating has always shielded him from stagnancy. His works reflect 
          this character of his and efficaciously highlight various impulses 
          which feed it; all the cross (diverse) references of the dissimilar 
          worlds he belongs to -  a culture spawned by emerging technology to 
          that rooted in profound philosophy. In both the cases Parthan seems to 
          be a part of these individual worlds and yet at times plays a role of 
          a mere spectator. Constantly preoccupied with existential questions, 
          he desires to find coherent explanations of the worldly matters, and 
          the beyond.  
          
          To Parthan it is not 
          the obvious but the arcane which draws a new pathway to think on. 
          According to him Science (as a subject) does provide empirical 
          evidence for the concerned problems, which get accepted as facts; but 
          what about the abstruse, the indefinable! It always remains a matter 
          of subjectivity. These questions have accompanied Parthan ever since 
          his childhood in varying, rather mounting intensity. Belonging to a 
          first generation nuclear family, and with both the parents working, he 
          had a lot of (unsupervised) time for himself; and was invariably left 
          to discover and understand the worldly matters on his own. ‘I was left 
          to explore the world and to find answers to my questions on my own.’ 
          says Parthan. 
          
          Growing up in 
          seclusion Parthan set up a private world in which books to an extent 
          acted as a medium to resolve all the questions which cropped up in his 
          mind. Following which he frequented the Public Library at Kottayam and 
          eventually it became a cozy second home for him. Exposed to a wide 
          spectrum of subjects, it was the methodology
          of science that fascinated him a 
          lot. ‘Since I had innate analytical tendencies and was logically 
          sound, as a youngster I strongly wanted to be an inventor.’ recalls 
          Parthan. The way in which different hypothesis, concepts were 
          postulated and elucidated, the architects of different theories and 
          their imagination and investigational methods, and the methods to 
          accurately infer all seemed parallel to the working of his own curious 
          mind.  
          
          For a person with 
          Caucasian origin there was stress on social contribution by 
          individuals, whereas ‘Art’ fell under the category of leisure pursuit. 
          As Parthan enjoyed science he took up studies in botany and later in 
          civil engineering. Till then apart from practicing art at a functional 
          level Parthan had not read much on it. It was ‘The 
          Anxious Object’ 
          
          by 
          Harold Rosenberg which totally transformed his
          views on art. For the first time he 
          found that art could be placed in the category of intellectual 
          disciplines. ‘The book spoke about how art has its own histories and 
          embedded philosophies. This opened the entirely new world of art 
          history and aesthetics to me.’ says Parthan, and this proved to be a 
          turning point for him. Abandoning his study in engineering Parthan 
          decided to study at the Goa College of Art. Something that started as 
          a simple, light hearted dabbling in a different field, landed to be a 
          serious and deep engagement for the rest of his life. His mind was 
          caught up by this newly discovered field, as a result he plunged into 
          art historical reading. As words poured their voice, they uncovered 
          different perspectives prevailing in different cultures to Parthan; 
          for instance he became aware of their histories, mythologies, their 
          notions of bravery, fear, etc. Different world views helped him to 
          see, understand and rationalize the role played by artists and their 
          works within a social milieu; that 
          of acting as medium to make visible the undercurrents which define a 
          particular culture.  
          
          In this process what 
          Parthan was becoming increasingly aware of was his own rootlessness. 
          He recalls, ‘American pulp fiction, by Mickey Spillane was a part of 
          my earliest reading, later came the Victorian books. These books along 
          with those on science had a setting free from the local flavour (of 
          Kerala) as a result I was unable to experience and engrain the true 
          Kerala culture, and consequentially a feeling of rootlessness crept 
          in.’ Knowing that though he was physically present, he was yet distant 
          from absorbing the ethos of his own land. This made Parthan think 
          about the notions of origin, evolution, commingling of different 
          cultures, etc, and since then he has been religiously studying 
          anthropology and different cultures. Not limiting to a factual 
          analysis of cultures Parthan chose to understand/ study the nerve of 
          individual cultures. To him philosophy has been his lifeline, and 
          logic a channel to understand it. 
          
          Moving 
          to a more tangible world, Parthan recollects that David Hockney’s work 
          on optics, camera obscura, and his research had always fascinated him.
          Parthan 
          was impressed by the manner in which Hockney explained how art and 
          science were interwoven; the purview of both the faculties could be 
          merged to produce a language which had an identity of its own which 
          did not tilt toward either. While maintaining an aesthetic, technical 
          and philosophical balance in his works titled ‘Source Code’, he 
          blends the ‘technical aesthetic code’ with his paintings, proving that 
          one cannot divorce these two diverse disciplines. 
          
          ‘As I always say it is 
          the ‘mysterious’ aspect that draws me to different subjects, once that 
          mystery is unraveled I always look for another options.’ quips Parthan. 
          He reads with radical omnivoracity, and employs a course of inclusion 
          and exclusion with an open mind, to decipher his newly found options. 
          Parthan can be called a man of many worlds: an individual exposed to 
          contrasts - of a partially conservative culture in Kerala, to a 
          radically opposite gypsy one in Goa; 
          from being a highly techno savvy individual to one deeply immersed in 
          philosophical 
          reading. He constantly undergoes a process 
          of transformation; he blends and reforms his identity thereby 
          dissolving all boundaries. 
           
          
          Picture courtesy : Baiju Parthan    | 
        
            |