‘…myths
get thought in man unbeknownst to him.. I think there are some
things we have lost, and we should try perhaps to regain them…
because I am not sure that in the kind of world in which we are
living and with the kind of scientific thinking we are bought to
follow, we can regain these things exactly as if they had never
been lost; but we can try to become aware of their existence and
their importance.’
MYTH
AND MEANING CLAUDE LEVI-STRAUSS
We
live in a world which tires easily of technological progress and
condemns discoveries of the day before, as outdated and
redundant. Art practices all over the world are under constant
scrutiny and perennial rejection. Even so, there is a concentric
reconstruction, a lingering thread of continuity in myth and its
magnificent permeation in art. Myth is often imbibed,
plagiarized or even scavenged upon in order to give a fake
“ethnic” glitter to a style. Very rarely does an artist
absorb the mythological content of the culture to which he
belongs and integrates it with wit and sophistication in his
work. K.Laxma Goud is by all means one who has internalized this
process and mastered it.
Laxma’s
stylistics, whether in etching or in sculpture as it is the case
in this exhibition, embrace skill and creativity alike and in
that sense he is a classicist in the true sense of the word. His
relationship with terracotta is complex and vitalizing. Each
sculpturesque detail is manifested with the ease and passion of
one who is in tandem with his chosen medium. The clay is made to
twist, fold and taper in order to articulate forms and define
them.
Little
wonder that sculptors and artists at large are likened
to Vishwakarma Himself. Goud’s forms and figures ---
whether they are human, animal or as architectural details ---
are all intense representations of his myth and his reality. As
with K.G. Subramanyan here too, one can visualize the artist
clasping the clay, then shaping, honing and moulding it. The
magic of Laxma Goud lies not only in the fact that he creates a
form in hair-splitting detail and great finesse, but more
extraordinarily the same form, structure, technique all gather
in cerebralized participation to yield an inclusionist
vocabulary, a common lingo to integrate complex factors. A
highly skilled approach to portray folk and tribal elements
through his interpretive methodology. His style, in effect, is
erotic, spiritual and sourced from Indian tradition. On the
other hand, Goud could easily be a sculptor from the Kushan age,
describing stiff, frontal images which, even when they conform
to human scale, seem monumental and somewhat monolithic.
Goud’s ease with the third dimension is just as masterful as
his etchings and it is interesting to observe his penchant for
various textures over a highly finished surface or a network of
lines which highlight and surround particular areas of a given
form. Occasionally, the sculpture itself turnas into his plate
on which he “etches”! At other times he revels in the
multi-dimensional scope that sculpture offers him and he
perambulates his image ---- patting, pinching, coaxing, and
serrating every fiber of the work, turning it into a complete
work art.
Metal
casting and the glowing patina on some of the works, could lead
one to believe that this has been the focus of Laxma Goud’s
oeuvre all along. It contains the singular devotion of one who
has surrendered his craft in order to surmount technique and go
far beyond it. Paradoxically, there exists a Spartan economy in
these works, especially in their delineation and again, there is
an engaging sense of embellishment and details in each form.
Similarly, the bulbous outline of each face detailed with its
features, might only impart sediments of the volcano which
actually lies dormant within the smooth cheeks of those faces.
These faces could belong to a cave, a tribal hut, a studio or
its civilized destiny --- an art gallery. These faces are
structurally dazzling. Here too the dichotomy persist: they are
representational as well as abstract. The seemingly vacant eyes
and postures stir up elements of mudra and abhinaya. The
analogous drama of underplay and vociferous defining continues.
He
is an embroiderer of sorts, attaching rich detail to each angle
as he approached it. He is a conjurer --- materializing
innumerable cells, limbs, figures from a frenzied vision which
is both prolific as well as innovation.
Truly,
as strauss said, ‘myths get thought in man unbeknownst to him.
‘In Laxma Goud’s universe, we peer at many myths, only some
of which have been discovered. Good is an acute technician and
invokes virtuosity with élan. He is an intense architect who
begins with the point, goes on to the line, creates angles and
by undoing geometric formations, he creates newer kaleidoscopic
images. He is a designer with a skilled acumen for ornamentation
and style. He choreographs his protagonists’ moves in order to
balance. From within a tiny platform and bewildering make-up, he
orchestrates a veritable performance. He is bafflingly modern
even though his sources are traditional. He is a farmer ---
ploughing, uprooting, sowing, sprouting.
Laxma
Goud might manifest differently moments but his most dazzling
quality seems to lie in the fact that he undertakes complex
formal challenges and overcomes each one with a simple sparse
solution. That, above all, makes him a child and a poet. That
astute symmetry in his silence makes him a master.
Anahite
Contractor
Anahite
Contractor has read for Masters’ degrees in English Literatre
and Art Criticism (both from the Maharaj Sayajirao University,
Baroda) and a third in Art Administration, Creative Curating
(Goldsmith College, London University) with an intership at
M.O.M.A. Oxford as the first Indian theorist to receive the
Charles Wallace award. She writes on contemporary art and
architecture. Her poems have been published in India and U.K.
|