|
The
Guild At Contemporary Istanbul Art Fair
The
Guild Art Gallery is delighted to present
NAVJOT
ALTAF
VIDYA
KAMAT &
PRAJAKTA
POTNIS
At
the CONTEMPORARY ISTANBUL, International Art Fair 2007, booth number
– b305.
Date:
November 28th – December 2nd, 2007
Information:
www.guildindia.com
Navjot Altaf,
born
in 1949 in the North Indian city of Meerut she is considered one of
India's earliest video artists. Navjot’s work orients away from the
individualistic, towards collective endeavors. Her work on projects
with students and women has always been a part of a wider concern on
social and educational issues, through which she has sought
alternative art practices and communication outside the gallery space.
She has been associated with varied fields, being an Artist, a
Researcher, an Anthropologist, a Social Worker and a Political
Activist. Since 1999, she has also been engaged with ongoing
site-oriented art projects with tribal artists from Bastar,
Chattisgarh in Central India. Working across
mediums, she has been using video since 1994.
“The
current body of work 'B
o m b a y S h o t s' is
an interactive project between Navjot Altaf and diverse people living
and working in Mumbai city, and its rapidly expanding suburbs. At one
level one senses a lack of contact and association with newly
developed areas, but at another level one recognizes people's constant
interest in communication / dialogue and the richness of heterodoxy in this
mega city. Interested in an interactive process of art-making
Navjot Altaf and her team over the period met and talked to people in
different parts of the city of Bombay. This dialogical process helped
understand people's relationship / association with the city at
various levels and the sites they relate to most, wish to visit,
remember and like to be photographed with - but can
not always do. The idea of 'B o m b a y S h o t s' evolved from
this interaction.” –
Navjot Altaf.
Vidya
Kamat, born in Bombay, her engagement with the physicality and
mortality of human body began while she was working as a museum
curator of the anatomy section. Placing her own image as an emblem of
a particular representational category, she critiques the social
imposition of values on such representations. Footnotes
to Innana (I- V) deals with the Pre-Menstrual Syndrome (PMS),
taking the texts written by feminist sociologists as a point of
departure, Vidya superimposed these texts on her digitally manipulated
portraits. Gender as a critical category and feminism as critical
theory not only questions the specific modern constructions of the
female body-self but also of modernism at large.
“Kamat
is neither an ethnic artist stuck in the box of anthropology-as-art,
nor is she blasé secularist, a cosmopolitan artist distancing herself
from the past and personal; struggles:
she does not abolish
the sacred to attain the secular, but instead extends herself through
symbolic performances that gauge the density and mobility of her
individuation. For these works are nothing less than wagers of a
difficult process of individuation. I would content that Kamat is
working towards personhood that can be achieved only through shifting
performance in the course of which she assumes several personae. She
is trying slowly to individuate herself, from the crisis of loss of
faith in herself, the lack of trust in loved ones, the sense of being
orphaned and disinherited from the realm of affection” – Nancy
Adjania
Prajakta Potnis' work is about interpreting realities through
dreams, understanding the real through the perceptions and the
aspirations around it. This series of work is associated with the
idea of selling dreams. The popular concept of ‘dream house’ is
one that is enveloped with the pressure of achievements and success.
The commodities that are made out of public emotions intrigue her. The
gigantic proud structures are symbolic to the standards, set to judge
the capacity or the success of an individual, while the insecurities
of being accepted is left for the consuming middle class to deal with.
She has tried to stitch these overpowering structures into a uniformed
social structure, where the imperceptible barriers that mark
territories within communities or classes reflect the invisible/hidden
walls or membranes which like protective layers build divisions
between the insider and the outsider and raise questions of belonging
and being accepted.
“The
intimidating architecture spread across large cities dominates the
mindset of its inhabitants. It immediately demarcates the various
economic strata within the society, giving rise to an Upper Class, a
Middle Class and a Lower Class. With the former and latter being such
extremes, it is the predominant middle class that suffers the life of
sweat and pandemonium to sustain the living conditions. The area that
Potnis addresses lies within the four walls of a household wherein
life grows / decays. These issues are viewed as "a still
life" effect within an interior space where the 'still wall'
works as a veil and also as organic separations between the inside and
the outside world. The 'wall' also refers to the margins that develop
within communities in a city to the bodily margins like the skin or a
membrane. She draws an intimate viewpoint to echo the complex
psychological characteristics of people living within the four walls
of a house or a city.” –
Kanchi Mehta.
|