“Ashutosh’s works
dramatize both the symbiotic relationship as well the representational
distance that exists between desire – here a realm of symbolic, ‘ideal’
forms, gathered mostly from the world of advertising, whose
commodity-fetishes occur frequently as signifiers of an endlessly
deferred promise - and the world of everyday life whose social
structures have, in the light of his own experiences proved to be deeply
divisive. They foreground the ways in which social iniquities are elided
in both these orders under the artifices and conventions that govern
them; in the process he also speaks about some of the problems inherent
in representation itself, which in its imperfect and incomplete
mirroring of the truth is an unstable enterprise that is also
potentially deceitful. The sheer excessiveness of his pictorial
language, its layer upon layer of detail, and the episodic, shifting
clusters of collage, quotation and fragments suggest, at one level, a
lifeworld completely dominated and governed by the ubiquitous media
industry, - in these works a kind of dream factory disseminating a
proliferating economy of images which produce and regulate our desires,
which are embodied in his visual world in objects and in the social
values ascribed to them in their function as indicators of class and
class aspiration. The organization of this visual world also evokes what
Frederic Jameson calls the schizophrenia that marks consumer culture, in
its extensive use of
disconnected and discontinuous material signifiers and is a further
reminder of the ways in which affluence has, in our time become a virtue
in itself. If the principal thematic focus of his visual - conceptual
universe is the way in which social relationships are mediated by the
communications industry, he is also simultaneously trying to draw
attention to deep-rooted forms of intolerance and violence that exist
underneath the normalcy of everyday life. This disconnect, between a
lived experience of social strife, and the chimerical constructions of
the media industry is a recurring theme, one that he
pushes into
more ominous territory in his frequent
coupling of
capitalism and religious fundamentalism, which figure here as inverted
images of each other, - one reproducing existing inequalities in its
single-minded pursuit of profit and power, the by-products of which
are, among other things, the uprooting of populations, the disruption of
traditional social orders and the widening of the divide between the
haves and the have-nots, and the other its expected consequence, born of
real grievances and wounds, but by
itself representing a reactionary worldview and agenda.”
(Extract from an essay on
Ashutosh Bhardwaj’s work written by Sathyanand Mohan)
|
|
|
|